Victory Road

Victory Road (http://www.victoryroad.net/index.php)
-   Pokémon Black and White (http://www.victoryroad.net/forumdisplay.php?f=104)
-   -   New pokemon type (http://www.victoryroad.net/showthread.php?t=1893)

Quadcentruo February 6, 2010 05:24:06 PM

New pokemon type
 
1 Attachment(s)
If your like me, you have seen the siloulette (sorry if that is spelled wrong) for the pokemon in Gen 5.

You would also be wondering what type it is.
So, what do you think it is?

If you ask me, it's either a normal type of fighting type.

EDIT: There was some fan-art of what the pokemon could look like. Now i'm saying its a dark type or fighting type.

Magmaster12 February 6, 2010 05:46:19 PM

Well I think it's probably a Dark type.

Also next gen it'd be cool to see a Dragon/Ice pokemon because it'll have no weaknesses.

Quadcentruo February 6, 2010 05:56:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magmaster12 (Post 28804)
Also next gen it'd be cool to see a Dragon/Ice pokemon because it'll have no weaknesses.

It would be weak to dragon.

Besides, i find Kingdra, being a water/dragon type, annoying enough. Only weak to dragon type... grr....

Loechai February 6, 2010 11:15:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magmaster12 (Post 28804)
Well I think it's probably a Dark type.

Also next gen it'd be cool to see a Dragon/Ice pokemon because it'll have no weaknesses.

It would be weak to Rock, Metal and Fighting, too. So that´s it for having no weaknesses.

Zega February 7, 2010 06:56:43 AM

Dark/Fighting. That's what I think. It looks like a werewolf...

The Spirit of Time February 7, 2010 06:59:58 AM

I agree. Dark/Fighting is a good type.

Shadow February 7, 2010 08:18:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Spirit of Time (Post 28851)
I agree. Dark/Fighting is a good type.

Hey. Don't go suggesting this when I first said that to you... :P

Anyways, since I think it's a werewolf-sorta Pokémon, I guess Dark/Fight would work best. After all, it would be a very unique dual typing.

Magmaster12 February 7, 2010 08:44:02 AM

I think it'd also be cool to have a Fighting/Flying pokemon almost like the picture of the fake Farfetch'd I showed you.

Sableyed February 7, 2010 08:57:22 AM

Probably fighting. Also, when I read the title of this topic, I thought it was for discussing new pokemon types. I don't think we'll ever add another type. the 17 are balanced,

FreezeWarp February 7, 2010 10:57:26 AM

I'm thinking it could be Dark, Fighting, Dragon, Rock, or Ground, but a silhouette alone can be hard to distinguish.

GreenLiquid February 7, 2010 01:04:44 PM

If I knew the coloration, I could make a more educated guess, but right now I'm going to guess Fighting and something else. We need a Fighting-type legendary.

Justjack91 February 7, 2010 11:41:46 PM

I enjoy the idea of it being Dark-fighting like others have said. Good immunity to Psychic, several notable resistances, and you could make this similar to Lucario in usage (good attacker, low defenses, good typing).

In my opinion, I doubt this would be a legendary they revealed. I think of "Lucario and the Mystery of Mew" and automatically think of the Gen IV debates on if Lucario was a legendary.

Shadow February 8, 2010 07:57:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quadcentruo (Post 28799)
EDIT: There was some fan-art of the pokemon. Now i'm saying its a dark type or fighting type.

I just want to make clear the point that there are many other fan-arts of this new silhouette, so please do not take this as the actual Pokémon or something. This is not confirmed and is not real, but it might give us an idea of how the Pokémon looks.

Quadcentruo February 8, 2010 11:27:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow (Post 29073)
I just want to make clear the point that there are many other fan-arts of this new silhouette, so please do not take this as the actual Pokémon or something. This is not confirmed and is not real, but it might give us an idea of how the Pokémon looks.

Yes, i understand that much.
If i knew where to find the other fan-arts i would post them :?

RK-9 February 12, 2010 01:48:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreenLiquid (Post 28940)
If I knew the coloration, I could make a more educated guess, but right now I'm going to guess Fighting and something else. We need a Fighting-type legendary.

Legendary? WRONG. It has a pre-evolution, therefore, it is not a legendary.

Magmaster12 February 12, 2010 01:51:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eeeveee (Post 29579)
Legendary? WRONG. It has a pre-evolution, therefore, it is not a legendary.

Green Liquid poseted that before before it was revealed.:roll:

FreezeWarp February 13, 2010 11:32:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eeeveee (Post 29579)
Legendary? WRONG. It has a pre-evolution, therefore, it is not a legendary.

Isn't Manaphy a legendary?

Flare Soru February 14, 2010 09:54:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreezeWarp (Post 29810)
Isn't Manaphy a legendary?

doesn't matter. Phione does NOT evolve into manaphy.

Quadcentruo February 14, 2010 05:02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flare (Post 30054)
doesn't matter. Phione does NOT evolve into manaphy.

Even though it looks like it does :roll:

LiteTheIronMan February 14, 2010 09:03:41 PM

It's going to be something we'd never expect. Something really broken too. It's a Bug Grass type.

I don't see why Dark/Psychic or Dark/Fire aren't plausible. The thing IS a master of illusion, supposedly, and its color scheme has some red tones in it.

Hakaku February 15, 2010 05:39:36 PM

Arcanine is actually a legendary and it evolves from a growlithe.

GreenLiquid February 15, 2010 05:41:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hakaku (Post 30348)
Arcanine is actually a legendary and it evolves from a growlithe.

It's not a legendary, but its species description is the "Legendary Pokémon."


All times are GMT -8.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Victory Road ©2006 - 2024, Scott Cat333Pokémon Cheney